dotlah! dotlah!
  • Cities
  • Technology
  • Business
  • Politics
  • Society
  • Science
  • About
Social Links
  • zedreviews.com
  • citi.io
  • aster.cloud
  • liwaiwai.com
  • guzz.co.uk
  • atinatin.com
0 Likes
0 Followers
0 Subscribers
dotlah!
  • Cities
  • Technology
  • Business
  • Politics
  • Society
  • Science
  • About
  • Technology

Would Your Mobile Phone Be Powerful Enough To Get You To The Moon?

  • July 3, 2019
Total
0
Shares
0
0
0

Many people who are old enough to have experienced the first moon landing will vividly remember what it was like watching Neil Armstrong utter his famous quote: “That’s one small step for a man, one giant leap for mankind.”. Half a century later, the event is still one of the top achievements of humankind. Despite the rapid technological advances since then, astronauts haven’t actually been back to the moon since 1972.

Astronaut David R. Scott, Apollo 15 commander. NASA

This seems surprising. After all, when we reflect on this historic event, it is often said that we now have more computing power in our pocket than the computer aboard Apollo 11 did. But is that true? And, if so, how much more powerful are our phones?

On board Apollo 11 was a computer called the Apollo Guidance Computer (AGC). It had 2048 words of memory which could be used to store “temporary results” – data that is lost when there is no power. This type of memory is referred to as RAM (Random Access Memory). Each word comprised 16 binary digits (bits), with a bit being a zero or a one. This means that the Apollo computer had 32,768 bits of RAM memory.

In addition, it had 72KB of Read Only Memory (ROM), which is equivalent to 589,824 bits. This memory is programmed and cannot be changed once it is finalised.

A single alphabetical character – say an “a” or a “b” – typically requires eight bits to be stored. That means the Apollo 11 computer would not be able to store this article in its 32,768 bits of RAM. Compare that to your mobile phone or an MP3 player and you can appreciate that they are able to store much more, often containing thousands of emails, songs and photographs.

Phone memory and processing

To put that into more concrete terms, the latest phones typically have 4GB of RAM. That is 34,359,738,368 bits. This is more than one million (1,048,576 to be exact) times more memory than the Apollo computer had in RAM. The iPhone also has up to 512GB of ROM memory. That is 4,398,046,511,104 bits, which is more seven million times more than that of the guidance computer.

But memory isn’t the only thing that matters. The Apollo 11 computer had a processor – an electronic circuit that performs operations on external data sources – which ran at 0.043 MHz. The latest iPhone’s processor is estimated to run at about 2490 MHz. Apple do not advertise the processing speed, but others have calculated it. This means that the iPhone in your pocket has over 100,000 times the processing power of the computer that landed man on the moon 50 years ago.

The situation is even more stark when you consider that there will be other processing built into the iPhone which looks after particular tasks, such as the display.

What about a calculator?

It’s one thing comparing against a state-of-the-art phone, but how did the Apollo 11 computer compare against a classic calculator? Texas Instruments was one of the most famous manufacturers of calculators. In 1998, they released the TI-73, and in 2004, they released the TI-84.

The following tables shows the specification of these two calculators.

Texas Instruments: TI73 and TI-84 Calculator Specifications.

If we compare the two calculators against the Apollo guidance computer we can note that the TI-73 has slightly less ROM, but eight times more RAM. By the time the TI-84 was released, amount of RAM had increased to 32 times more than the Apollo computer and the ROM was now more than 14,500 times more.

Comparision of TI-73 and TI-84 memory with AGC.

With regard to processing speed, the TI-73 was 140 times faster than the Apollo computer and the TI-84 was almost 350 times faster.

It’s mind-blowing to think about that a simple calculator, designed to help students decades ago pass their exams, was more powerful than the computer that landed man on the moon.

What if Apollo 11 had had a modern computer?

The Apollo computer was state-of-the-art in its time, but what would have been different if the moon landing had the state-of-the-art computers that are available today?

I suspect that the software development time would have been a lot faster, due to the software development tools that are available today. It would have been a lot quicker to write, debug and test the complex code required to deliver a man to the moon.

Apollo Guidance Computer (AGC) Creative Commons

The user interface (called Display Keyboard (DSKY)) had a calculator-type interface where commands had to be input using numerical codes. Today’s interface would be a lot easier to use – which could matter in a stressful situation. It would almost certainly not have a keyboard, but would use swipe commands on a touch screen. If that were not possible, due to having to wear gloves, the interface might be through gestures, eye movement or some other intuitive interface.

Surprisingly, one thing that wouldn’t be better today is the communication speed with Earth. The actual time it takes to communicate is the same today as it was in 1969 – that is, the speed of light, which means that it takes 1.26 seconds for a message to get from the moon to Earth. But with the larger files we now send – and from greater and greater distances – to get an image from a spacecraft to Earth today will take relatively longer than it did in 1969. That said, it would look much prettier thanks to advances in camera technology.

Perhaps the biggest change we would see is the computer being a lot more artificially intelligent. I am sure that the flying and landing of the space craft would not be put solely into the hands of the computer, but it would have much more information and intelligence and would be able to make many more decisions than the Apollo 11 computer was able to do in 1969. This could be a huge relief for the astronauts. Armstrong did say that, on a worrying scale from one to ten, walking on the moon was about a one – whereas making the final descent to land was about a 13.

So let us end by acknowledging what it took to land people on the moon in 1969 with the limited computing power that was available at the time. It really was a remarkable achievement.The Conversation

 

Graham Kendall, Professor of Computer Science and Provost/CEO/PVC, University of Nottingham

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Total
0
Shares
Share
Tweet
Share
Share
Related Topics
  • Apollo 11
  • Computing
  • Moon
  • Smartphones
  • Space Exploration
majulah

Previous Article
  • Technology

Enabling Data-Driven Innovation Through Trusted Data Sharing In A Digital Economy

  • June 28, 2019
View Post
Next Article
  • Lah!

Singapore Passport Ranked Most Powerful Again According To Henley & Partners Passport Index

  • July 3, 2019
View Post
You May Also Like
oracle-ibm
View Post
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Technology

IBM and Oracle Expand Partnership to Advance Agentic AI and Hybrid Cloud

  • Dean Marc
  • May 6, 2025
View Post
  • Software
  • Technology

Canonical Releases Ubuntu 25.04 Plucky Puffin

  • Dean Marc
  • April 17, 2025
View Post
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Technology

Tokyo Electron and IBM Renew Collaboration for Advanced Semiconductor Technology

  • Dean Marc
  • April 2, 2025
View Post
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Technology

IBM contributes key open-source projects to Linux Foundation to advance AI community participation

  • dotlah.com
  • March 22, 2025
View Post
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Technology

Mitsubishi Motors Canada Launches AI-Powered “Intelligent Companion” to Transform the 2025 Outlander Buying Experience

  • Dean Marc
  • March 10, 2025
View Post
  • Technology

New Meta for Education Offering is Now Generally Available

  • Dean Marc
  • February 26, 2025
View Post
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Technology

Deep dive into AI with Google Cloud’s global generative AI roadshow

  • dotlah.com
  • February 18, 2025
View Post
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Technology

How the UK’s plans for AI could derail net zero – the numbers explained

  • dotlah.com
  • February 9, 2025


Trending
  • cities-average-construction-cost-per-square-meter-25409 1
    • Cities
    Tokyo Is The World’s Most Expensive City For Construction
    • August 3, 2021
  • 2
    • Cities
    To Help Solve Global Problems, Look To Developing Countries
    • February 29, 2020
  • 3
    • Lah!
    NEA Urges Collective Community Action As We Enter Traditional Peak Dengue Season
    • May 18, 2020
  • 4
    • Lah!
    OCBC Bank And Staff Donate Additional S$1,225,000 To Provide Targeted Support To 1,000 Needy Singaporean Families And 55,800 Migrant Workers
    • May 2, 2020
  • 5
    • Lah!
    A.I. Technology That Cuts Energy Use By More Than 20%, Wins Top Prize At Inaugural Innovation Challenge By ENGIE, NTU Singapore And JurongHealth Campus
    • June 30, 2020
  • covid-19-graffiti-adam-niescioruk-Z9arfr0f248-unsplash 6
    • Climate Change
    • Environment
    • People
    • World Events
    These Are The World’s Greatest Threats In 2021
    • January 27, 2021
  • 7
    • Lah!
    • Society
    Singapore And Brunei Successfully Conclude 24th Edition Of Exercise Maju Bersama
    • February 8, 2020
  • beach-photo-1515350681417-300dee45d0e9 8
    • Cities
    What Are The Most Expensive Australian Cities To Buy A House In? Find Out Here
    • July 15, 2021
  • 9
    • People
    • Technology
    Twitter Is Now X. Here’s What That Means.
    • July 25, 2023
  • 10
    • Society
    The World’s Top Remittance Recipients
    • May 4, 2020
  • covid19-vaccine-julia-koblitz-6u8sbtz0q1c-unsplash 11
    • People
    Five Things To Know About: Mixing And Matching Coronavirus Vaccines
    • May 20, 2021
  • 12
    • Lah!
    Doing Our Part To Safeguard Economic Resilience
    • April 8, 2020
Trending
  • 1
    Trump’s global trade plans are in disarray, after a US court ruling on ‘Liberation Day’ tariffs
    • May 29, 2025
  • 2
    315,000 Singaporeans have used new career and skills planning tool by SkillsFuture Singapore
    • May 23, 2025
  • college-of-cardinals-2025 3
    The Definitive Who’s Who of the 2025 Papal Conclave
    • May 8, 2025
  • conclave-poster-black-smoke 4
    The World Is Revalidating Itself
    • May 7, 2025
  • oracle-ibm 5
    IBM and Oracle Expand Partnership to Advance Agentic AI and Hybrid Cloud
    • May 6, 2025
  • 6
    Conclave: How A New Pope Is Chosen
    • April 25, 2025
  • 7
    Canonical Releases Ubuntu 25.04 Plucky Puffin
    • April 17, 2025
  • 8
    Mathematicians uncover the logic behind how people walk in crowds
    • April 3, 2025
  • 9
    Tokyo Electron and IBM Renew Collaboration for Advanced Semiconductor Technology
    • April 2, 2025
  • 10
    Tariffs, Trump, and Other Things That Start With T – They’re Not The Problem, It’s How We Use Them
    • March 25, 2025
Social Links
dotlah! dotlah!
  • Cities
  • Technology
  • Business
  • Politics
  • Society
  • Science
  • About
Connecting Dots Across Asia's Tech and Urban Landscape

Input your search keywords and press Enter.